Assess the Prevalence of Camels Gastrointestinal Helminthes and associated risk factors in Harshin Districts of Fafan Zone

Assess the Prevalence of Camels Gastrointestinal Helminthes and associated risk factors in Harshin Districts of Fafan Zone, Eastern Ethiopia
Mahad Hassan Miad1, Berhe Mekonnen Mengistu1 and Habtom Kiros Bitsue1
1Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary, Mekelle University, Kelamino, Mekelle, Ethiopia.
ABSTRACT
Heavy helminthic infection causes significant impacts in the camel health, as a resulting have high morbidity and mortality rate. Despite, still have very unreliable and insufficient information in Ethiopia. Therefore, the objectives of this study was to estimating the prevalence of gastrointestinal tract (GIT) helminthes and assess the risk factors associated with gastrointestinal helminthes infestation of camels in Harshin districts of Fafan Zone, Eastern Ethiopia. A cross-sectional study method was conducted for collection of faecal sample from the rectum of camels, and then we perform Flotation, Sedimentation and McMaster egg counting techniques to identify the egg parasites, and to estimate the burden of infestation of the parasites. The faecal examination under the microscope revealed an overall prevalence of 52.6%. Out of the total, 384 sampled 202 of camels’ excreted faeces with have helminthes eggs. The most common encountered parasites of eggs were Strongyle spp. (23.4%), Trichostrongylus spp. (23%), Nematodirus spp. (15.8%), Trichuris spp. (15.1%), Haemonchus spp. (17.1%) and Monezia spp. (5.2%). Regarding, the sex wise there were higher mean egg counted in female as compared to the male camels. Similarly, also there was statistically significant differences in mean eggs per gram (epg) of faeces were observed among other risk factors, like age, body condition score and faecal description (P0.05) (Table 2).
Table2: Association of the prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in camels with different risk factors using Chi-square test (?2)
Variables No. of animals examined No. of animals found positive (%) ?2 P-value
Origin 132636 0.001
1.Lankeyrta 96 59(61.4)
2.Kuda 95 59(62.1)
3.Farha liban 193 84(43.5)
Sex 1.0108 0.603
Male 159 82(51.5)
Female 225 120(53.3)
Age (years) 4.3057 0.116
10 142 20(71.4)
BSC 2.7410 0.254
Poor 74 43(59.7)
Medium 167 82(48.5)
Good 143 77(54.2)
Faecal description 22.4487 0.000
Thick 228 102(44.9)
Soft 83 61(73.4)
Pellet 52 25(48)
Softgreenish 5 4(80)
Dark thick 16 10(62)

DISCUSSIONS
According, the present result of this study was found that GIT helminthiasis was one of the main problems of camel health in the study area. The finding of this study was in agreement with the previous result of other researchers that conducted GIT helminthiasis was the main problem of camel worldwide Fadl et al. (1992) and Rewatkar et al. (2009). Our present study revealed that out of the total, 384 camels examined 52.6% (202/384) of camels harbour at least one type of gastrointestinal helminthic parasite. This finding coincides with the previous reports of overall infestation rate 62.7% in Northern Tanzania Swai et al. (2011); 68.9% dromedaries’ in Nigeria Kamani et al. (2008); 78.0% in Sokoto metropolis Mahmud et al. (2014); 75% in Nigeria Ukashatu et al. (2012); 75.1% in Iranian Borji et al. (2010); 75% in Eastern Ethiopia Bekele, (2002) and 76.2% in Bahrain Abubakr et al. (2000). However, this finding was comparatively lower than the prevalence of prevalence reported of 80% in Southern Ethiopia by Bekele, (2010); 80.73% in Yabello by Demelash et al. (2014); 92.4% in Nigeria Bamaiyi et al. (2011); 96.9% in Eastern Ethiopia Tekle and Abede, (2001) and 98% in Jordan Sharrif et al. (1997). In contrast, our result was higher than the prevalence reports of 26.9% in camels of Egypt Ahmed, (2014); 28.4% in the camels of the desert thal of Pakistan Alvi et al. (2013) and 37.3% in camels of Faisalabad Azhar et al. (2013). Relatively the higher prevalence of GIT helminthiasis of camels in the study area could be attributed to lack of improved animal health management system and lack of knowledge of farmers in treating GIT parasites. The possible enlightenment for the variation among the countries might be the infestation rate could be variations in agro-ecological conditions between countries, which favor or disfavor the survival of the parasite eggs and larvae stage, and husbandry practices Allport et al. (2005) and Mohamed et al. (2008). Moreover, the occurrence of the parasite was associated with nutritional, level of immunity status of the animals, rainfall, humidity and temperature differences and season of examination on the respective study areas.
The prevalence of 23.4% Strongylus spp. of this study was lower than prevalence rate of reports of 87.3% Ukashatu et al. (2012) and 92.4% Bamaiyi et al. (2011). Meanwhile, 23% Trichostrongylus spp. was comparatively lower than of 79.67% finding of Demalesh et al. (2014); other gastrointestinal parasite eggs encountered included, Trichuris spp. (15.1%) and Monezia spp. (5.2%), which does not coincide with species rate finding of Demalesh et al. (2014) and Bamaiyi et al. (2011), Strongyloid spp. (32.9%), (8.5%), Trichuris spp. (0.64%), (11.4%) and Monezia spp. (10.64%) (1.9%), respectively, Nematodirus spp.14.7% was in contrast lower than 56.8% of Demalesh et al. (2014). In contrary, to other previous studies Trematode spps were not detected in this study and the main reason for this was absence of vector and less humidity of the study area. Because most of Trematodes require intermediate hosts to complete their life cycle and usually water snails which were found around water bodies were the most common vectors of many Trematode spps as described by Andrew, (1999).
The result of this study also showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of GIT helminthes in relation to sex (P >0.05); however, the intensity of infections showed significant association with sex showing high faecal egg count in female than in male. Although, the numbers of examined males were lower than females, due to this the prevalence and intensity infestation (FEC) rate was slightly higher in female 53.3% than 51.5% in male camels. This finding concur with most of previous researcher who have observed higher rates of parasite infestation/worm burden in female hosts to compared with the males Maqsood et al. (1996); Komoin et al. (1999); Valcarcel and Romero, (1999). Contrarily, Gulland and Fox, (1992) found higher rates of infestation in males than females. Generally, the higher prevalence of parasitic eggs were found in female than male camels counterpart may be due to the physiological peculiarities of the female camels, such as pregnancy and parturition, which usually constitute stress factors, thus reducing their immunity to fight the infections Wakelin, (1984).
The result revealed higher rates of infestation in camels >10 years old (71.4), than camels between 0.05).This result was agreed with Demaleshet al. (2014) observed higher prevalence in >10years old, but in contrary to this result with Swai et al.(2011) observed higher prevalence in 6-10 years old (70%). In the current study overall prevalence no was statically significantly (P>0.254), however, higher in poor body conditioned 59.7% than good 54.2% and medium 48.2%. This finding was in line with Swaiet al. (2011) who found higher prevalence in poor body conditioned (83.3%) followed by good (62.7%) and medium body conditioned (61.2%) camels. Generally, poorly nourished animals appear to beless competent in getting rid of infection although it is unusual for well feed animals to succumb the disease inright environmental conditions Kimberling, (1988).
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The result of the present study indicated that the prevalence of GIT helminthes in the study area was estimated to 52.6%. Prevalent in dromedary camels extensively managed in Harshin woreda. From this result gastrointestinal Nematodes are an important health problem in the study area; they affecting the wellbeing and productivity of camels. In this study six species of nematodes including Strongylus, Trichostrongylus, Nematodirus, Trichuris and Haemonchusspp. were identified whereas Moneziaspp. was the only cestode detected in the study area. It was found that body condition, age and origin was significant in association with prevalence of camel GIT helminthes.
Taking these facts into consideration the following recommendations are forwarded:
? Awareness creation on common parasitic diseases of camel should be given to camel owner of the study area in order to prevent helminthic infections,
? Strategic deworming should be implemented to reduce the exposure and
? Further studies should be conducted to determine the pathological impact of parasitic infections in the country.
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
? The authors have declared there is no any conflict of interests.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
? The author sincerely would like to appreciate MekelleUniversity College of Veterinary Medicine for provision of the laboratory and other facilities.
? They also extend their thanks to the Harshin districts three peasant associations (PA’s) for providing their animals for sampling to conduct the study. Furthermore, Veterinary Parasitological Laboratory of Somali Regional State of Ethiopia
REFERENCES
Abbas B, Agab H (2002). Review of Camel Brucellosis.Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 55:47-56.
Abebe D (2000). Pastoral and Pastoral Production System in Proceeding of Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP). Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, pp: 1-5
Abubakr MI, Nayel MN, Fadlalla ME, Abdelrahman OA, AbuobeidaSA,ELgabara YM (2000).Prevalence of Gastro-Intestinal Parasites in Young Camels in Bahrain.Revue d’Elevage-etde-MedecineVeterinaire-des-Pays Tropicuax, 53(3):267-271.
Ahmed AR (2014). Epidemiological Studies on Parasitic Infestations in Camels (Camelusdromedaries) In Egypt Department of Animal Medicine (Infectious diseases), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt. European Journal of Environmental Ecology, 1(1):16-20.
Al-DahashS,Sassi M (2009). A Preliminary Study on Management, Breeding and Reproductive Performance of Camel in Libya.Journal of Veterinary Science, 23:276-281.
Allport R, Mosha R, BahariM,Swai E, Catley A (2005).The Use of Community-based Animal Health Workers to Strengthen Disease Surveillance System in Tanzania. Revue scientificqueettechnique,International Office of Epizootics, highlands of Tanzania. Veterinary Research,24(3):921-932.
Alvi F, Muhammad S, Iqbal Z, AsiM,Qurat A (2013).Descriptive Epidemiology of Gastrointestinal and Parasitic Fauna of One Humped Camel (C. dromedaries) Population of the Desert Thal, Pakistan.International Camel Conference, pp: 35.
Andrews SJ, (1999). The Life Cycle of FasciolaHepatica. In: J.P. Dalton, (ed)Fasciolosis. CAB,Wallingford, pp: 1-29.
Azhar M, LateefM,Zahid M (2013). Prevalence and Chemotherapy of Gastrointestinal Parasites of Camels.International Camel Conference, pp: 44.
BamaiyiPH,Kalu UA (2011). Gastro Intestinal Parasites Infection in One Humped Camels (Camelusdromadaries) in Nigeria.Veterinary Research Forum, 2(4):278-281.
Bekele T (2002). Epidemiological Studies on Gastrointestinal Helminthes of Dromedary (Camelus dromedaries) in Semi-arid lands of Eastern Ethiopia. Veterinary Parasitology, 105:139-152.
Borji H, Razmi G, Movassaghi A, NaghibiA,Maleki M (2010). A Study on Gastrointestinal Helminthes of Camels in Mashhad Abattoir, Iran.Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research, 11:174-179.
ChabraM,Gupta S (2006). Parasitic Disease of Camels- an Update-2.Helminthosis, Journal of Camel Practical Research, 13(2):81-87.
CSA(2017). Report On Livestock and Livestock Characteristics (Private Peasant Holdings): Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Central Statistical Agency. AddisAbaba, Ethiopia.
Demelash K, Alemu F, NiguseA,Feyera T (2014). Prevalence of Gastro Intestinal Parasites Efficacy of Antihelminthes against Nematodes in Camels in Yabello District Southern Ethiopia.ActaParasitologicaGlobalis, 5(3):223-231.
Durrani AZ (1991). Faecal Culture Technique, MSc. (Hons) Thesis, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
FadlM,MagzoubM,Burger H (1992). Prevalence of Gastro Intestinal Nematode Infection in the Dromedary Camel (Camelus dromedaries) in the Butana plains, Sudan.Revue d’Elevage-etde-MedecineVeterinaire-des-Pays Tropicuax,4(3-4):291-293.
Faye B, BengoumiM,ViateauE,Chilliard Y (2001). Adipocyte Patterns of Adipose Tissue in CamelHump and Kidney.Journal of Camel Practice and Research, 8:29-33.
Fowler ME (1996). Husbandry and Diseases of Camelids. Revue cientifiquet Technique-Office International Des Epizooties (Scientific and Technical Review of the Office International des Epizooties) 15(1):155-169.
GullandF, Fox M (1992). Epidemiology of Nematode Infections of Soay on St. Kilda., Parasitology, 105(3):481-492.
Kamani JK, Turaki AU, Egwu GO, Mani AU, Kida SM, Abdullahi JG, Damina MS, KumsheHA,DogoGI (2008). Prevalence of Gastro Intestinal Parasites in Camillus dromedaries Slaughtered in Maiduguru, Nigeria.Journal of Practical Research, 15(2):181-182.
Khan B, IqbalbA,Riaz M (2003). Production andManagement of Camels. University of Agriculture,Faisalabad, Pakistan, pp:152-156.
Kimberling CV (1988). Jensen and Swift’s Diseases of Sheep.3rd ed. Lea and Feigner,Philadelphia,LaeandFeigner, pp:29-33.
Komoin O, ZinsstagJ,PandeyV,Fofana F, DepoAN (1999). Epidemiology of parasites in. Southern forest zone of Coted’Ivoire. Revue-d’Elevage-etde-MedecineVeterinaire-des-Pays- Tropicaux, 52(1):39-46.
Mahmud A, Mohammed AA, Alayande MO, Habila YI, Lawal MD, Usman M, Raji AA, Saidu B, YahayaMS,Suleiman N (2014). Prevalence and Distribution of Gastrointestinal Parasites of Working Camels in Sokoto Metropolis.Veterinary World, 7(3):108-112.
Maqsood M, Iqbal Z, Chaudhry A (1996). Prevalence and Intensity of Haemonchosis Referenceto Breed, Sex and Age.PakistanVeterinary Journal, 124:177-195.
MohamedA, Mahmoud R,AbdellaGA,Abou EE (2008). The influence of Some Nematode Parasitism on Lipid Metabolism and Lipoprotein Profilein Dromedary Camel.Journal of Camel Science, pp: 63-67.
Parsani HR, Singh V,Momin RR (2008). Common Parasitic Diseases of Camel.Veterinary World,1(10):317-318.
Rewatkar SG, Dekhmush SS, Deshkar SK, Maske DK, JumdePD,Bhangale GN (2009).Gastro intestinal helminthes in migratory camel.Veterinary World, 2(7):258.
Richard D (1979). Study of the Pathology of the Dromedary in BoranaAwraja (Ethiopia). PhD Thesis; IEMVT, Maisons-d’Alfort, France,pp: 312.
Sharrif L, Al-qudah KM, Al-ani FK (1997). Prevalence of Gastro Intestinal HelminthesinOne Humped Camel (Camelusdromedaries) in Jordan. Journal of Camel PracticalResearch, 41:67-69.
Soulsby EJL (1982). HelminthesArthropodsandProtozoa of Domesticated Animals.7th ed. BailliereTindall, London: LeaandFeigner, Philadelphia, pp: 231-250.
Swai ES, MoshyW,MshangaD, LutatinaJ,Bwanga S (2011). Intestinal parasitic Infections of Camels in the Agro and Pastoral Areas of Northern Tanzania Veterinary Investigation Centre,Arusha, Tanzania.VeterinaryResearch, 4:34-38.
Tefera B (2009).Seroprevalence of Camel Brucellosis in Pastoral Areas of Ethiopia, DVM Thesis, Gondar, Ethiopia.
TekleT,Abede G (2001). Trypanosomiasis and Helminthiasis: Major Health Problems of Camels in the Southern Rangeland of Borana of Ethiopia. Journal of Camel Practical Research, 8(1):39-42.
Thrusfield M, (2005). Veterinary Epidemiology, 3rd ed. Blackwell Science Ltd, UK. Pp 233-250.
Ukashatu S, Saulawa M,Magaji A (2012). Epidemiology of Gastrointestinal Parasites of One- Humped Camel (C. dromedaries) Slaughtered in Sokoto Central Abattoir, Sokoto State, Nigeria.Scientific Journal of Veterinary Advance, 1(4):105-109.
Valcarcel F,Romero CG (1999). Prevalence and Seasonal Pattern of Trichostrongylus in a Dry Area Central Spain.Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series, 46(10):673-681.
Wakelin D (1984). Immunity to parasites: how animals control parasites infections. 1st ed. Edward. Arnold (Publishers Ltd), pp: 93-117.
Wernery U,KaddenR(2002).Infection Diseases in Camelids, 2nd ed. Blackwell, Berlin.
Wosene A (1991). Traditional Husbandry Practices and Major Health Problems of Camels in the Ogaden, Ethiopia, Nomadic People, 29:21-30.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now